comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Feature request: printing very long arrays

Home » Public Forums » archive » Feature request: printing very long arrays

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Feature request: printing very long arrays [message #91159 is a reply to message #91127]

Tue, 09 June 2015 10:03

wlandsman
Messages: 743
Registered: June 2000

Senior Member

On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 8:48:47 AM UTC-4, Helder wrote:

> However, sometimes I'm too eager to look at what's hidden under the name and I go directly for the print option. And if I'm so stupid to do that on array of say 4096 x 4096 elements... well it takes a while and the only way to stop this useless overflow of data is to kill the IDL process.

You should be able to interrupt the display with Control^C without killing the IDL process.

At the terminal, I still like to use the MORE capability, and instead of PRINT I use a procedure that tests for the value of !MORE, e.g.

http://idlastro.gsfc.nasa.gov/ftp/pro/misc/forprint.pro

But this doesn't work from the IDL workbench.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Feature request: printing very long arrays By: Helder Marchetto on Mon, 08 June 2015 05:48
		Re: Feature request: printing very long arrays By: optiksguy on Tue, 09 June 2015 06:43
		Re: Feature request: printing very long arrays By: Lajos Foldy on Tue, 09 June 2015 08:57
		Re: Feature request: printing very long arrays By: Helder Marchetto on Wed, 10 June 2015 00:56
		Re: Feature request: printing very long arrays By: wlandsman on Tue, 09 June 2015 10:03
		Re: Feature request: printing very long arrays By: Paul Van Delst[1] on Tue, 23 June 2015 11:22
		Re: Feature request: printing very long arrays By: Helder Marchetto on Wed, 24 June 2015 04:13

Previous Topic:	trouble with image(), /data, /norm
Next Topic:	Extraction from *.txt file

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 18 10:35:29 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02169 seconds