comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL vs. PV-WAVE
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL vs. PV-WAVE [message #9292 is a reply to message #275] Wed, 11 June 1997 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
wmc is currently offline  wmc
Messages: 117
Registered: February 1995
Senior Member
In article c6e@mozo.cc.purdue.edu, gpetty@rain.atms.purdue.edu (Grant W. Petty) writes:
> After looking around this ng, I have to admit to being put off by a
> couple of seemingly recurring complaints about IDL: (1) persistent and
> difficult-to-work-around bugs in basic plotting routines -- e.g.,
> missing grid lines, etc., and (2) the apparently steep learning curve,
> based on people's remarks about the need for expensive IDL training
> courses to learn widgets, etc.

1. There are some irritating bugs in the plotting (especially doing polar
stereos...) but they are few and far between.

2. Widgets seem to be particularly complex, but you probably don't need them.
As far as I can tell, they are mostly useful for polished-product programs and
not so useful for research-type work.

- William

---
William M Connolley | wmc@bas.ac.uk | http://www.nbs.ac.uk/public/icd/wmc/
Climate Modeller, British Antarctic Survey | Disclaimer: I speak for myself
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: how to do bitwise operation in IDL???
Next Topic: Re: FINDFILE problem

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 14:17:49 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.87932 seconds