comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL UNIX->PC code compatability
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL UNIX->PC code compatability [message #9348 is a reply to message #9345] Fri, 20 June 1997 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Bill Sawchuck is currently offline  Bill Sawchuck
Messages: 3
Registered: June 1997
Junior Member
Scott Gennari writes:
> It's just too bad an IDL/ENVI license will cost more than the PC. That
> seems warped to me.
>

David Fanning replies:
> Even a 266 MHz PII is just a doorstop without software. Seems to
> me that a large part of the value of any system is the software
> you put on it. The question is, do you save $1500 of time and
> effort using IDL as opposed to doing whatever it is you do some
> other way. Maybe you could write C programs. How much time and
> effort do you think it would take you to learn to write your
> programs in Visual C++? In my situation, I would probably starve
> before I figured it out. Makes IDL look like a bargain, at least
> to me.

Let's not forget about RSI's maintenance policy. Ten percent of the
current s/w price per year assures that you will always have the latest
version on hand as soon as it is released. Once you've made the initial
investment in the software, the maintenance is a breeze. Currently for a
PC based license that comes out to $12.50 per month. Considering what you
get for this, I consider IDL the software bargain of the decade. We need
to keep in mind that IDL just doesn't have the broad market base that other
languages such as Visual C++ enjoy. What do you think Microsoft would
charge for IDL if it was marketed by them? Perhaps they could take some of
their best developers and produce a product similar to IDL at a lower
price. I think not. This issue of a small market base is exactly why
Microsoft has recently decided to dump their development efforts on Fortran
(user support and all!).

Bill Sawchuck
Space Telescope Science Institute
3700 San Martin Drive
Baltimore, MD 21218
sawchuck@stsci.edu
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: All New Service for your "Pager"...
Next Topic: Re: Absurd Indexes

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Nov 29 21:49:19 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.64192 seconds