comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Pros & cons of methods 1) DLM and 2) Call_External of calling C from IDL
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Pros & cons of methods 1) DLM and 2) Call_External of calling C from IDL [message #93518 is a reply to message #93517] Wed, 10 August 2016 07:44 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Michael Galloy is currently offline  Michael Galloy
Messages: 1114
Registered: April 2006
Senior Member
On 8/10/16 4:31 AM, neil.a.salmon@gmail.com wrote:
> I gather the difficulty here is in selecting the compiler options
> using the keywords CC and LD in the make_dll routine.
>
> I'm trying to use both Microsoft Visual Studio VC and the gcc
> compiler (both have different flags for compiler options). I don't
> really care which one works, i just need one of them to work.
>
> Any suggestions about what compiler options for these compilers?

Yes, this is why I use the default compiler on each platform so I don't
have to figure these things out. Even when I have my own build system,
i.e., using CMake, I just use the default compiler and copy the options
that !make_dll has over to my system.

Mike
--
Michael Galloy
www.michaelgalloy.com
Modern IDL: A Guide to IDL Programming (http://modernidl.idldev.com)
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: cgcontour and cgcolorbar irregular levels
Next Topic: Code for network analyses

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:31:06 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00440 seconds