comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » some users will be harmed by the new licensing policy in IDL 8.6
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: some users will be harmed by the new licensing policy in IDL 8.6 [message #94078 is a reply to message #94075] Fri, 13 January 2017 10:38 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
chris_torrence@NOSPAM is currently offline  chris_torrence@NOSPAM
Messages: 528
Registered: March 2007
Senior Member
Hi Patrick, Wayne, et al,

Thank you all for your thoughtful responses. As a long-time IDL user myself (pre-RSI-employee), my workflow remains essentially the same as yours.

Just some background. Sticking with our old licensing code was becoming impossible - it was no longer being actively maintained by our vendor, and we started to see more people abusing it by running IDL on a server for cloud-based computing. The new Flexera software has both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are an easier licensing process for most customers, less headaches for our tech support group, and more flexibility for splitting licenses among features (such as "main" IDL versus "bridge" versus the "task engine"). The disadvantages are less flexibility on the licensing schemes, such as the "flexible single use", since the licenses are now definitely tied to a particular host. We also needed to make difficult decisions on the feature count, which is what you have unfortunately run up against.

Our overall goal remains the same - make an easy-to-learn, fast, robust language which scientists and engineers can use to find answers in their data. We don't want anything to get in the way of that, including licensing.

Here is my suggestion. If you haven't already contacted Tech Support (or heard back from them), I would strongly recommend emailing support<AT>harris.com. Include your customer information, including a brief description of why IDL is important in your daily research (just for some context). Also, most importantly, include your specific license requirements, such as "I need to run 12 full IDL processes simultaneously, and it's only for me on my one machine", or "I need to run 1-2 IDL sessions on both my Mac and Windows machines, and I don't want to activate/deactivate."

Tech Support will forward your request on to your sales representative who will most likely ask for more information, just to see if a different license type might be a better fit. In general, if you are making a reasonable request, then we will try to do the right thing, especially for our long-time trusted customers (i.e. you!).

I hope this helps.
Cheers,
Chris
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: How to run correl_optimize IDL code
Next Topic: Looping through arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:55:57 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00589 seconds