comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » some users will be harmed by the new licensing policy in IDL 8.6
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: some users will be harmed by the new licensing policy in IDL 8.6 [message #94106 is a reply to message #94105] Thu, 19 January 2017 14:39 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Helder Marchetto is currently offline  Helder Marchetto
Messages: 520
Registered: November 2011
Senior Member
On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 11:27:41 PM UTC+1, Helder wrote:
> On Thursday, January 19, 2017 at 11:24:26 PM UTC+1, wallabadah wrote:
>> It might also be worth noting that the lmgr() function has been decimated, presumably related to the change in licensing model.
>>
>> From IDL 8.5 online help:
>>
>> Result = LMGR( [, /DEMO | , /EMBEDDED | , /RUNTIME | , /STUDENT | , /TRIAL | , /VM] [, EXPIRE_DATE=variable] [, /FORCE_DEMO] [, INSTALL_NUM=variable] [, LMHOSTID=variable] [, SITE_NOTICE=variable])
>>
>> and from IDL 8.6:
>>
>> Result = LMGR( [/RUNTIME | , /VM])
>>
>> One of my applications uses the LMHOSTID return variable to check it's being run by a registered user... which is no longer possible in 8.6. It was a neat way of finding out the MAC address of the host, and I'm sure I wasn't the only one using it....
>>
>> looking for a solution,
>>
>> Will.
>
> Hi Will,
> thanks for reporting this. I was doing the same exact thing: using lmgr to check the mac address and validating that.
> Nooooooo!
> Why remove the function if it is not used by IDL licensing software? We had access to it and we used it for our own licensing!
> Great!
> I'll write tech support.
> H.

It seems like the only workaround will be retrieving the mac address using spawn and some string handling:
windows: "getmac" eventually with options /FO csv or /FO list
linux (debian as su): ifconfig | grep HWaddr

At list there is some workaround, but still lmgr() was much easier to manage.

And what drives me *** is the lack of backward compatibility. If somebody installs 8.6, I can't ask them to run older software because the lmgr would fail.

Cheers, Helder
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: How to run correl_optimize IDL code
Next Topic: Looping through arrays

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:28:40 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00479 seconds