comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Efficient comparison of arrays

Home » Public Forums » archive » Efficient comparison of arrays

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Efficient comparison of arrays [message #9742 is a reply to message #9707]

Thu, 14 August 1997 00:00

William Clodius
Messages: 30
Registered: December 1996

Member

David Foster wrote:
> <snip discussion of problems with the use of sorting for an algorithm>

The problem is not the use of a sorting algorithm, the problem is the
use of an inefficient sorting algorithm.

--

William B. Clodius Phone: (505)-665-9370
Los Alamos Nat. Lab., NIS-2 FAX: (505)-667-3815
PO Box 1663, MS-C323 Group office: (505)-667-5776
Los Alamos, NM 87545 Email: wclodius@lanl.gov

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Efficient comparison of arrays By: Andy Loughe on Fri, 08 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: J.D. Smith on Thu, 14 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: David Foster on Thu, 14 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: William Clodius on Thu, 14 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: William Clodius on Wed, 13 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: J.D. Smith on Wed, 13 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: David Foster on Wed, 13 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: J.D. Smith on Tue, 12 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: J.D. Smith on Mon, 11 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: davidf on Mon, 11 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: davidf on Mon, 11 August 1997 00:00
		Re: Efficient comparison of arrays By: John Votaw on Wed, 20 August 1997 00:00

Previous Topic:	Animations to mpeg/fli
Next Topic:	performing a TVRD() on 24 bit images...

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:28:17 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00467 seconds