comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Suggestion for IDL6 -- variable declarations

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Suggestion for IDL6 -- variable declarations

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Suggestion for IDL6 -- variable declarations [message #17237]

Mon, 20 September 1999 00:00

Mirko Vukovic
Messages: 124
Registered: January 1996

Senior Member

In article <7s4qie$51j$2@alster.dkrz.de>,
m218003@modell3.dkrz.de (Martin.Schultz@dkrz.de) wrote:
> In article <7s09tk$4v6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> Mirko Vukovic <mvukovic@taz.telusa.com> writes:
>>
>> Another example is the Annotation type object. As someone cried out
for
>> TeX-like notation instead of the !- control sequences, this is
>> accomplished easily within such an object. You pass it the sequence
in
>> TeX-like notation, and when IDL needs it, it spews out the
>> !-like notation that IDL understainds. What is even better, you can
>> specify Annotation to use certain fonts by default (like roman
complex)
>
> Well, if you have a working version of ANNOTATE__DEFINE, I'd be glad
to
> receive a copy!
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
:-)
Not implemented yet !!!

I was writing what I was planning to do. Next time I'll keep my
fingers tied up. I'll post when I come up with something.

Apologies for raising false hopes.

Mirko

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Suggestion for IDL6 -- variable declarations By: Mirko Vukovic on Mon, 20 September 1999 00:00
		Re: Suggestion for IDL6 -- variable declarations By: m218003 on Mon, 20 September 1999 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: FLASH - Colors Update
Next Topic:	Best,Fastest platform for IDL 5.2 (NT or UNIX)

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 06:05:07 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.24205 seconds