comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Plot [snip!] feature (was: Re: Plot bug or another "strange feature" ?)

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Plot [snip!] feature (was: Re: Plot bug or another "strange feature" ?)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Plot [snip!] feature (was: Re: Plot bug or another "strange feature" ?) [message #20098]

Wed, 17 May 2000 00:00

Liam E. Gumley
Messages: 378
Registered: January 2000

Senior Member

Nicolas Decoster wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> I agree with you, my double precision data are beyond the boundaries of
> the plot procedure. I think the real issue here is: "is the float
> conversion is a good choice". It is the RSI choice and it is ok in most
> case. It just does not fit my perticular need. But a choice can't fit
> all needs. Ok. Perhaps some other RSI choices will fit some of my needs
> (*). Let's follow the "no exceptation" strategy suggested by David.

FYI: Don't quote me, but I hear that the low-level plotting routines are
modified to use double precision by default in IDL 5.4.

Cheers,
Liam.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

Re: Plot [snip!] feature (was: Re: Plot bug or another "strange feature" ?)

By: Liam E. Gumley on Wed, 17 May 2000 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: Plot [snip!] feature (was: Re: Plot bug or another "strange feature" ?)
Next Topic:	Plot [snip!] feature (was: Re: Plot bug or another "strange feature" ?)

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 18:33:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.20392 seconds