comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: call

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: call_method

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: call_method [message #26476]

Thu, 06 September 2001 14:24

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Pavel A. Romashkin (pavel.romashkin@noaa.gov) writes:

> Oh... This never occurred to me. I have never even attempted making a
> pro and a function with the same name. Duh...

Ah, well, one day when I didn't feel like working
I got to thinking "what if" and the next thing you
know I had learned something new about IDL. I
filed it under "Reasons You Gotta Love IDL",
hoping someone would ask about it some day. :-)

But it makes sense, because one of the things IDL
saves when a file is compiled is whether it is a
procedure or function. They go in separate tables
internally, I guess.

Cheers,

David

P.S. Let's just say having a childish attitude
about work (or a poor memory) results in more remarkable
discoveries than you might at first imagine. :-)

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: call_method By: David Fanning on Thu, 06 September 2001 14:24
		Re: call_method By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Thu, 06 September 2001 13:54
		Re: call_method By: David Fanning on Thu, 06 September 2001 13:27
		Re: call_method By: Kristian Kjaer on Fri, 07 September 2001 15:03
		Re: call_method By: Mark Hadfield on Thu, 06 September 2001 20:42

Previous Topic:	Re: structure information
Next Topic:	Re: Problem combining structures

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:22:52 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00402 seconds