comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Xtools Clarification

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Xtools Clarification

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Xtools Clarification [message #28495]

Fri, 07 December 2001 13:38

Martin Otte
Messages: 4
Registered: October 2001

Junior Member

In article <3C11267F.6300466C@rsinc.com>, Matthew Powell
<mpowell@rsinc.com> wrote:

> - The Xtools product will be dynamically linked in when we compile so
> there will be no need for the user to buy Xtools.

This statement makes me more confused???

Wouldn't the user still need the Xtools X-server to show the IDL
X-windows, even if the X11 libraries are statically linked into IDL?

Or will somehow a stand-alone X-server also be built into IDL, so that
no external X11 implementation (either Xtools or XDarwin) will be
necessary??

Otherwise, it's good to hear that RSI has listened to our concerns
about IDL and Mac OSX!!! I'm looking forward to Altivec accelaration
and easy linking with fortran/C routines and libraries, at the expense
of the nice Mac IDL user interface.

Martin

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

Re: Xtools Clarification

By: Martin Otte on Fri, 07 December 2001 13:38

Previous Topic:	go button
Next Topic:	Re: go button

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 14:52:08 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00387 seconds