comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: nonuniform FFT

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: nonuniform FFT [message #34658]

Tue, 08 April 2003 11:26

b_gom
Messages: 105
Registered: April 2003

Senior Member

Thanks for the link Steven. The page looks familiar- I must have seen
it at some point and then completely forgotten about it. Unfortunately
it is based on the FFTW library, which I have been having trouble
compiling as a DLM for IDL. Do you know of anyone who has wrapped NFFT
or FFTW for IDL?

I see that http://epsilon.nought.de/ has something in development, and
I've tried the DLM posted by Stein Vidar Hagfors Haugan a couple years
ago, but I get all sorts of strange crashes when I try to use it. I'm
hoping someone with more windows C experience than me has already got
it working!

Brad

stevenj@alum.mit.edu (Steven G. Johnson) wrote in message news:<27cfb406.0304071157.37f1b97b@posting.google.com>...
> b_gom@hotmail.com (Brad Gom) wrote in message news:<bde24eff.0304041525.3cc5d5bb@posting.google.com>...
>> has anyone out there implemented a FFT routine that handles
>> nonuniformly gridded samples?
>
> See: http://www.math.mu-luebeck.de/potts/nfft/

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: nonuniform FFT By: b_gom on Tue, 08 April 2003 11:26
		Re: nonuniform FFT By: b_gom on Tue, 08 April 2003 11:04
		Re: nonuniform FFT By: stevenj on Mon, 07 April 2003 12:57
		Re: nonuniform FFT By: b_gom on Mon, 07 April 2003 12:09
		Re: nonuniform FFT By: John Smith on Mon, 07 April 2003 11:47
		Re: nonuniform FFT By: James Kuyper on Mon, 07 April 2003 07:10
		Re: nonuniform FFT By: AJ on Mon, 07 April 2003 07:20
		Re: nonuniform FFT By: MKatz843 on Mon, 07 April 2003 00:09

Previous Topic:	Re: how to create .exe
Next Topic:	Font sizes/Screen vs. Postcript/Contour dropping lables

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:35:24 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00376 seconds