comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: about replicate

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: about replicate_inplace

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: about replicate_inplace [message #35890]

Wed, 23 July 2003 11:04

xje4e
Messages: 18
Registered: February 2002

Junior Member

"Richard Younger" <younger@ll.MIT.edu> wrote in message
news:3F1ECC7B.B3E675BA@spaMIT.edu...
> 0.37500000 seconds, BYTARR and [*]
> 0.35899997 seconds, BYTARR/nozero and [*]
> 0.14100003 seconds, BYTARR and REPLICATE_INPLACE
> 0.12500000 seconds, BYTARR/nozero and REPLICATE_INPLACE
> 0.10899997 seconds, REPLICATE_INPLACE
> 0.12500000 seconds, MAKE_ARRAY
> 0.093999982 seconds, onebyte+BYTARR

From these results, it seems that replicate_inplace is the quickest way to
assign particular values to an array. But to have an array having values 0,
BYTARR is the quickest way according to my test.

Best regards,

Xiaoying

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: about replicate_inplace By: xje4e on Wed, 23 July 2003 11:04
		Re: about replicate_inplace By: Richard Younger on Wed, 23 July 2003 10:57
		Re: about replicate_inplace By: R.G. Stockwell on Tue, 22 July 2003 16:42
		Re: about replicate_inplace By: JD Smith on Tue, 22 July 2003 15:25
		Re: about replicate_inplace By: Mark Hadfield on Tue, 22 July 2003 14:46

Previous Topic:	Re: Leading zeros in Format
Next Topic:	IDL 6.0 is released!

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 20:40:39 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.55771 seconds