comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: what is an efficient lossless compression way to store a gray-scale image

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: what is an efficient lossless compression way to store a gray-scale image

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: what is an efficient lossless compression way to store a gray-scale image [message #36255]

Wed, 27 August 2003 10:36

Stein Vidar Hagfors H[2] is currently offline

Stein Vidar Hagfors H[2]
Messages: 28
Registered: October 2002

Junior Member

Jonathan Boswell <jsb@ost.cdrh.fda.gov> writes:

> Julia wrote:
>> seems that there is no way to store gray-scale images in IDL
>> efficiently...
>
> I believe GIF is lossless if you have fewer than 256 "colors". What version of
> IDL do you have? There are licensing issues pertaining to the LZW compression
> used by the GIF standard, and recent versions of IDL will not run WRITE_GIF w/o
> additional expense.
>

See WRITE_PNG - 2D arrays work with or without a palette, on 8 or 16
bits per channel.

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Stein Vidar Hagfors Haugan
ESA SOHO SOC/European Space Agency Science Operations Coordinator for SOHO

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Tel.: 1-301-286-9028
Mail Code 682.3, Bld. 26, Room G-1, Cell: 1-240-354-6066
Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA. Fax: 1-301-286-0264
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: what is an efficient lossless compression way to store a gray-scale image By: Stein Vidar Hagfors H[2] on Wed, 27 August 2003 10:36
		Re: what is an efficient lossless compression way to store a gray-scale image By: Jonathan Boswell on Tue, 26 August 2003 10:59

Previous Topic:	Re: how to determine network yes or no
Next Topic:	Re: convert very large string to numeric

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:53:46 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00380 seconds