comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Font differences between IDL 5.6 and IDL 6.0
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Font differences between IDL 5.6 and IDL 6.0 [message #38227] Fri, 27 February 2004 10:11 Go to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Lynn writes:

> I found the reference.... in IDL help...Under Visual Enhancements.
>
> "IDL 6.0 incorporates the FreeType Library for improved rendering
> of Object Graphics fonts. Previously, characters in an IDLgrText object
> were rendered by tessellating each glyph outline into a set of small
> triangles. IDL 6.0 renders an entire IDLgrText string as a high quality
> bitmap, which is texture mapped onto a single polygon.
> This technique allows for clearer characters at any size, easier
> manipulations, background colors, kerning, and blending.
> For information on the FreeType Project, visit http://www.freetype.org."

Humm, yes. Just browsing those pages for a few minutes brings
back my graduate school nightmare of contouring protein surfaces.
There are LOTS of ways to do it. None exactly right, and none
exactly wrong, either. Choose your poison and then live with it. :-)

Cheers,

David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Inserting space between a 'widget_droplist' and a 'widget_button'
Next Topic: Re: amoeba/mpfit/etc with a quantized variable?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:03:04 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00546 seconds