comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: More OO jargon

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: More OO jargon [message #49401]

Mon, 24 July 2006 09:59

JD Smith
Messages: 850
Registered: December 1999

Senior Member

On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 16:48:48 -0700, Robbie wrote:

> I have recently published some of my frequently used base classes which
> are a part of my Nuclear Medicine software project (NMTK).
>
> NMTK Atom Tree:
> This is a factory class which manages a set of IDL graphics objects.
>
> NMTK Control:
> This is an alternative to using coventional OO event handlers.
> I consider this class to be more useful than xmanager because it has
> better support for multiple controls within the same UI. It's still
> incomplete because I'm hunting around to steal someones data model.
> Feel free to tack on your own data model.

Sounds like we're all reinventing the same wheel. David has his Catalyst
library, and I have my Object Messaging framework, both of which free you
from the constraining structure of "up the inheritance stack" message
passing, which is the default IDL event mode.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: More OO jargon By: JD Smith on Mon, 24 July 2006 09:59
		Re: More OO jargon By: Robbie on Mon, 24 July 2006 18:25
		Re: More OO jargon By: David Fanning on Sat, 05 August 2006 23:55

Previous Topic:	Re: Seconds to UTC date
Next Topic:	nearest number

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:36:44 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00463 seconds