comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: How to get a very large 2D projected surface image
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: How to get a very large 2D projected surface image [message #51875] Thu, 14 December 2006 08:56 Go to previous message
Rick Towler is currently offline  Rick Towler
Messages: 821
Registered: August 1998
Senior Member
Steven Houston wrote:
> Rick Towler wrote:
>
>> While this thread has run amok, JD's post is actually the line of
>> thought you'll want to pursue. You are going to have to render this
>> surface in pieces and then stitch the images together. You will need to
>> read the docs regarding the TEXTURE_HIRES keyword and experiment to find
>> the "zoom" level required to display the portion of the surface at full
>> resolution. You will need to determine exactly what ITTVIS means when
>> they say "zoom". Is their LoD code tied to IDLgrWindow requiring you to
>> use IDLgrWindow's Zoom* methods? Or is it more general, determining the
>> visible portion of the surface by calculating surface/frustum
>> intersection?
>
> It's the latter. If you want your texture to always be rendered at the
> full resolution set TEXTURE_HIGHRES=2, this disables the LoD calculation.

Good to know. The OP will most likely need to use the LoD tiling since
he/she probably doesn't have 1.5GB of texture memory to store the entire
20k x 20k texture.

-Rick
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Licensing problem
Next Topic: Re: Spawning EML Scripts in IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:08:50 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48238 seconds