comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » large info structure?

Home » Public Forums » archive » large info structure?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

large info structure? [message #56127]

Tue, 02 October 2007 08:10

markb77
Messages: 217
Registered: July 2006

Senior Member

Hi,

I'm writing a widget application which will serve as a data analysis
platform for scientific image data. The idea is that after loading
the image, there are many different types of analysis that the user
may wish to run on it, and this application will support them all.
There will be an 'Analysis' dropdown menu, for instance, with several
options. I also want to make it easy to add new analysis methods to
the program.

I've finished writing the front end and now I'm in the process of
adding some analysis. What I'm noticing is that the info structure
that gets passed around between event handlers is getting to be very
large. Mine is up to 130 variables, at the moment.

Does anyone have a strategy to suggest for dealing with this type of
situation? I'm worried that this info data will spiral out of
control. I was thinking that I could break down the info data into a
bunch of smaller structures, and hold pointers to each of those
structures in one higher level info structure..

thanks,
Mark

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		large info structure? By: markb77 on Tue, 02 October 2007 08:10
		Re: large info structure? By: markb77 on Fri, 05 October 2007 12:07
		Re: large info structure? By: David Fanning on Thu, 04 October 2007 20:01
		Re: large info structure? By: David Fanning on Thu, 04 October 2007 19:44
		Re: large info structure? By: markb77 on Thu, 04 October 2007 18:06
		Re: large info structure? By: R.Bauer on Wed, 24 October 2007 11:06

Previous Topic:	Re: weighted average for label_region
Next Topic:	Recognizing double precision?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:33:51 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00406 seconds