comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Recognizing double precision?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Recognizing double precision?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Recognizing double precision? [message #56145]

Sat, 06 October 2007 15:21

Bringfried Stecklum is currently offline

Bringfried Stecklum
Messages: 75
Registered: January 1996

Member

wlandsman wrote:
> About once a year I receive a complaint about my code because someone
> inputs a Julian date like this
>
> IDL> jd = 2441636.1
>
> and then gets mysterious results because the value of jd is
> "truncated"
>
> IDL> print, jd, f='(f10.2)'
> 2441636.00
>
> So it would it be reasonable to request that the IDL compiler
> recognize a number as double precision, if it has too many digits to
> be stored as a floating point number? After all, IDL does do
> something like this (in default mode) for short and long integers:
>
> IDL> a = 32767 & help,a
> A INT = 32767
> IDL> a = 32768 & help,a
> A LONG = 32768
>
> I can't imagine how adding this capability would break existing code.
>
> Does anyone know if other interpreted languages can recognize a double
> precision number when they encounter one? Thanks, --Wayne
>
Dear Wayne,

although I think that in principle the compiler could be able to make an
automatic type declaration based on the number of digits of the string
representing the numerical value, for the time being it might be easier
to check whether the input is indeed double precision or not. For
instance, I noticed that an earlier version of DAYCONV had the following
line at the beginning

sz = size(xjd)

However the information on the size of the argument xjd was never used.
Perhaps somebody had in mind the following?

if sz[1] ne 5 then message,'DAYCONV requires double precision!'

It would be hard to overlook a statement like this.

with kind regards,

Bringfried Stecklum

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Recognizing double precision? By: Bringfried Stecklum on Sat, 06 October 2007 15:21
		Re: Recognizing double precision? By: R.G.Stockwell on Fri, 05 October 2007 10:26
		Re: Recognizing double precision? By: David Fanning on Fri, 05 October 2007 08:16
		Re: Recognizing double precision? By: wlandsman on Mon, 08 October 2007 06:18

Previous Topic:	Re: running my procedure in VM
Next Topic:	Re: stippling or cross hatching in contour plot

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 04:37:44 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.11378 seconds