comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Philosophical Question about NAN
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Philosophical Question about NAN [message #63672] Wed, 19 November 2008 08:09 Go to previous message
Foldy Lajos is currently offline  Foldy Lajos
Messages: 268
Registered: October 2001
Senior Member
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008, R.G. Stockwell wrote:

> Also, it is not clear on how to handle a NAN - it is ambiguous.

Even IDL is confused. For a single element input, /cumul in TOTAL should
be a no-op. Let's try it:

IDL> print, !version
{ x86_64 linux unix linux 7.0 Oct 25 2007 64 64}
IDL> a=complex(1.0, !values.f_nan)
IDL> print, total(a, /nan)
( 0.00000, 0.00000)
IDL> print, total(a, /nan, /cumul)
( 1.00000, 0.00000)


regards,
lajos
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: dependency tree / call graph in idl (cscope for idl)?
Next Topic: bake a cake

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:40:44 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00413 seconds