comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: SIZE() vs. N

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS()

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() [message #67249]

Sat, 18 July 2009 02:40

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

On Jul 16, 3:59 pm, wlandsman <wlands...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2:39 pm, wlandsman <wlands...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any situation now where
>
>> one must use SIZE() to get the number of elements rather than
>> N_ELEMENTS().
>
> Immediately after posting I realized that the answer to the above
> question is "yes". In the following code using ASSOC(), N_Elements(a)
> equals 1, but size(a,/N_elements) equals 2. --Wayne
>
...

*poof* = sound of my mind being blown.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: Craig Markwardt on Sat, 18 July 2009 02:40
		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: wlandsman on Thu, 16 July 2009 13:25
		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: David Fanning on Thu, 16 July 2009 13:11
		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: David Fanning on Thu, 16 July 2009 13:04
		Re: SIZE() vs. N_ELEMENTS() By: wlandsman on Thu, 16 July 2009 12:59

Previous Topic:	Best form factor for a NetCDF package of a dataset
Next Topic:	Re: Linear fit with user defined weights

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:52:04 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00437 seconds