comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Optimization "AMOEBA"
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Optimization "AMOEBA" [message #68019] Thu, 24 September 2009 06:23 Go to previous message
Nicki is currently offline  Nicki
Messages: 14
Registered: September 2009
Junior Member
On 24 Sep., 10:13, Wox <s...@nomail.com> wrote:
>>> If there is for a
>>> specific N, a_max and R_i a "NaN" it won't stop the approximation,
>>> will it?!(i hope you know what i mean))
>
>> Okay, I added the other variables now and it works... and also the 3D
>> plot works...
>> If I have 3 Variables now, what do i need to add to the ploting
>> section? And is it possible to get the results for a second minimum as
>> well (if there is another local minimum?)
>
> I'm just wondering what you want to achieve here. Why do you want to
> use AMOEBA and not POWELL for example? Do you need to do this for 1
> function only or are there more? Do you always know the box
> constraints and is it always a box?

I thought about trying powell as well...maybe i should do this...what
would be the advantages of powell?
i actually have more equations, but kind of put them into each other,
eliminated a few parameters and got one superlong equation with five
variables...
i'm having box constraints for every parameter...
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDLDE and java crashes
Next Topic: Nearest neighbors

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:32:59 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00478 seconds