comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Avoiding multiple or complex WHEREs?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Avoiding multiple or complex WHEREs?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Avoiding multiple or complex WHEREs? [message #75220]

Mon, 21 February 2011 13:55

cgguido
Messages: 195
Registered: August 2005

Senior Member

On Feb 21, 3:46 pm, Paulo Penteado <pp.pente...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 21, 6:34 pm, Gianguido Cianci <gianguido.cia...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ah! I think I just discovered a use for !NULL, it would fit NaN better
>> here!
>
> !null is an undefined variable. It cannot be an element of an array of
> floats or doubles. It can be come where a variable can be, such as a
> list or map element, or a pointer target.

Yeah :-/ I guess I am trying to build something like a HASH with two
keys for each value... but I could be going about this completely
backwards!

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Avoiding multiple or complex WHEREs? By: cgguido on Mon, 21 February 2011 13:55
		Re: Avoiding multiple or complex WHEREs? By: cgguido on Mon, 21 February 2011 13:46
		Re: Avoiding multiple or complex WHEREs? By: penteado on Mon, 21 February 2011 13:46
		Re: Avoiding multiple or complex WHEREs? By: cgguido on Mon, 21 February 2011 13:34
		Re: Avoiding multiple or complex WHEREs? By: penteado on Tue, 22 February 2011 08:29

Previous Topic:	RK4 and IDL's array truncation
Next Topic:	howto select and deselect plotting windows?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:52:16 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00387 seconds