comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Contemplating Tick Lengths
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Contemplating Tick Lengths [message #77849] Mon, 03 October 2011 10:07
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
David Fanning writes:

> Function graphics tickmarks are even more incomprehensible.
> There doesn't seem to be any relationship whatsoever between
> a value and the plot or window or phase of the moon! I really
> don't understand how these work at all. There is one
> advantage of function graphics tickmarks, in that you can
> independently "control" both the major and minor tick lengths.
> But, since you can't figure out how they actually work, the
> advantage is of dubious value. :-(

I may be wrong about this. Tickmark lengths in function
graphics plots now appear to make more sense than direct
graphics tickmark lengths on simple plots. Perhaps
it is only on function graphics colorbar routines
(the subject of my investigation this morning) that
they are completely incomprehensible.

In any case, tick lengths appear to work differently
in a function graphics Plot() command and in the
Colorbar() function. I am not a big fan of the
Colorbar() function, so I could believe this is
the thing that is screwed up.

Cheers,

David


--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting, Inc.
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.idlcoyote.com/
Sepore ma de ni thui. ("Perhaps thou speakest truth.")
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Previous Topic: Contemplating Tick Lengths
Next Topic: Re: Multi-Threading in ENVI

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 02:29:09 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.19723 seconds