comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Difficulty with N

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Difficulty with N_ELEMENTS command

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Difficulty with N_ELEMENTS command [message #79222]

Sun, 12 February 2012 11:21

Yngvar Larsen
Messages: 134
Registered: January 2010

Senior Member

On Feb 12, 8:14 pm, Yngvar Larsen <larsen.yng...@gmail.com> wrote:

> A one-liner soulution (mostly because it fun :) could be
>
> exceed_freq = total(precip_day gt
> transpose(smoothed[*,lindgen(nyears)]), 2)
>
> or
>
> exceed_freq = total(transpose(precip_day) gt
> smoothed[*,lindgen(nyears)], 1)
>
> --
> Yngvar

Ironically, Google Groups decided that my one-liners really should be
two-liners :)

--
Yngvar

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Difficulty with N_ELEMENTS command By: Yngvar Larsen on Sun, 12 February 2012 11:21
		Re: Difficulty with N_ELEMENTS command By: Yngvar Larsen on Sun, 12 February 2012 11:14
		Re: Difficulty with N_ELEMENTS command By: Andrew King on Thu, 09 February 2012 20:32
		Re: Difficulty with N_ELEMENTS command By: cgguido on Thu, 09 February 2012 20:28
		Re: Difficulty with N_ELEMENTS command By: cgguido on Thu, 09 February 2012 20:21

Previous Topic:	confidence level
Next Topic:	Re: Writing 6sv (radiative transfer model) input files or reading output files

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:34:22 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00601 seconds