TIME_TEST results for 7500/100 Macintosh [message #6246] |
Mon, 13 May 1996 00:00 |
David Theil
Messages: 11 Registered: May 1996
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Just for fun, here are time_test results from a 7500/100
Macintosh with almost all extensions off, no file sharing,
nothing else running, etc. 2MB VRAM, no third party video board.
The times seem to be comparable to the Sparc 20.
Test# TIME_TEST TIME_TEST2 GRAPHICS_TIMES GRAPHICS_TIMES2
1 0.55 1.11667 0.43333 0.3000
2 1.03333 1.13333 2.05 4.833333
3 0.5 0.55 0.5 6.15
4 0.533333 0.616667 1.41667 1.2667
5 0.266667 0.266667
6 0.216667 2.2
7 0.166667 0.783333
8 0.2 0.633333
9 0.633333 1.58333
10 0.916667 2.71667
11 0.85 2.53333
12 0.116667 0.25
13 0.583333 0.45
14 0.1 0.166667
15 0.0166667 0.566667
16 1.3 0.116667
17 0.25 0.0166667
18 1.21667 1.3
19 0.0333333 0.25
20 0.25 2.5
21 0.183333 1.78333
22 0.166667 0.333333
23 1.25 12.25
Total 11.3333 34.1167 4.4 12.55
G-Mean 0.3103646 0.685019 0.890642 1.833
Total 11.8252 35.5960 4.81312 6.92581
G-mean 0.2668 0.6700 0.55283 1.12566
> Here's the results from a Sparc 20, 75 MHz, 2 CPU's, 64MB
> memory, Solaris 2.4. I ran it rlogged in, displayed results on Sparc
> 2. Just the usual many background tasks running on the Sparcs when
> doing the tests.
>> Total 4.704 11.736 1.250 4.250
>> G-mean 0.149 0.292 0.310 0.735
>> The system is a Micron Pro Magnun Plus (B) with a 200MHz Pentium Pro CPU,
>> 64MB (non-EDO) ram running Win NT 3.51. The graphics subsystem is a Diamond
>> Stealth 64 PCI w 2MB VRAM
With pix map backing store on, the graphics tests were about a factor
of three slower.
----------
David Theil
home work
University of Colorado
3360 34th St. D campus box 389
Boulder, Colorado Boulder, Colorado
80301 80309
(303)449-3113 (303)492-0895
No guts, no glory.
|
|
|