comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: How do people print .ps and .pcl files on windows95
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: How do people print .ps and .pcl files on windows95 [message #7620] Mon, 02 December 1996 00:00 Go to previous message
Peter Mason is currently offline  Peter Mason
Messages: 145
Registered: June 1996
Senior Member
On 29 Nov 1996 dean@phobos.cira.colostate.edu wrote:
> Use the print manager to setup the default printer. Then select Edit/print
> then a little window will ask for you to double click on the plot you wish
> to print. The plot will come out of the defulat print. No need to save it
> as PCL or PS. You just need to select edit/print from the IDL window.

This captures and prints a plot window. i.e., It is a "bitmap" sort of
operation, and the quality of the print may be restricted by the plot
window's resolution (which is most likely much lower than the printer's).

If you want, you can send a .PS or .PCL file directly to the default
Windows printer (which must be of the same type - ps or pcl - as the file).
Generate the file, then just use DEVICE,PRINT_FILE=filename to print it
(where "filename" is the name you gave your printfile). I use this
under NT; it should work under 95.
This method has a drawback - the DEVICE,PRINT_FILE= command appears to
return before the file has been printed. (Well, I suppose this might
depend on how the printer's spooling has been set up.) So you have to
leave the printfile hanging around - if you delete it before it's been
printed, you could crash IDL.


Peter Mason
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL Help for Advanced Users
Next Topic: keyword params in HISTOGRAM

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 10:50:43 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.55740 seconds