comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: TEMPORARY (was Re: Fragmented memory with IDL)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: TEMPORARY (was Re: Fragmented memory with IDL) [message #1037] Sat, 22 May 1993 00:22
webb is currently offline  webb
Messages: 3
Registered: May 1993
Junior Member
jdlb@kukui.ifa.hawaii.edu (J-F Pitot de La Beaujardiere) writes:
>
> (deleted description of operation of TEMPORARY)
>
> TEMPORARY, whose effects are PERMANENT, might perhaps be more aptly named
> COPY_AND_DELETE. :^)
>
Actually, TEMPORARY is more like DONOTCOPY_AND_DELETE, since it specifically
does not make a copy of the right hand side.

One somewhat odd but sometimes useful way to use TEMPORARY is to rename
variables. Running

A = TEMPORARY(B)

will effectively rename B to A, without incurring any memory overhead. Why
might you do this? It's one way of making widget applications easier to
write. Suppose you have you favourite widget application on the screen, and
when you click the button you want something to happen to a variable VAR whose
name is unknown to you when you started the widget. Inside the widget event
handler, always operate on, say ACTIONVAR. Make ACTIONVAR a member of a
common block declared within the event handler, then run

ACTIONVAR = TEMPORARY(VAR)

from somewhare else that also declares this common block, and now you can work
on your new variable. In the application I am working on, I keep a bunch of
data sets in named variables, then use a selection widget to swap them in and
out of my ACTIONVAR variable without incurring memory penalties. This keeps
the event handling code simple yet flexible.

Of course, the proper way to do this would be to allow some kind of pointer
type, then all this fooling around would be unecessary. Anybody
else miss pointers? Maybe I assume to much, but it seems that the IDL
interpreter must have pointers to variables readily (or not so readily)
available?

Peter
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Previous Topic: TEMPORARY (was Re: Fragmented memory with IDL)
Next Topic: Memory fragmentation, passing and common blocks

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:26:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00414 seconds